Enough of cake and cookies, out with the stale macaroons, the spent candles, the oddments of wrapping paper and ribbon behind the couch, under the couch, between the sofa cushions. Days lengthen, at first almost imperceptibly, and although there is so much winter yet to come, the soul begins its slow thaw, urging us in its quiet yet insistent way to put another log on the fire, even as the last bit of coral fades from the evening sky, and to begin again to write its story. It commands the fingers. It stakes its claim on the body.
Which soul is that? “The soul is in a way all things, because it can become a thing other than itself.” So says Heidegger by way of Etienne Gilson by way of Aquinas, fleeing the Cartesian prison for the more open and accessible world of the Greeks, who knew that consciousness is simply our mode of being in the world, who knew that consciousness is pure transparency, not a mental substance.
You want proof. Read a well made lyric poem. Or write one. Listen to a well made performance of a Chopin prelude. Or play one.
Here’s a how-to. We reside within the so-called stream of consciousness, which is in fact the world as it lights up within an open present, always and everywhere. More poetically and complexly, perhaps, on the page (page of poetry, of fiction, of music or its performance). The creative muscles, left to their own devices, want to embed consciousness — with all its seediness, banality, raucous humor, and flashes of beauty — so that something transcendent revolves before us — here, now, in the present — in a single breath. Soaring over the fences. Past the line-breaks. Through the arbitrary markers of measured endings — as the measures of music un-measure themselves in every fine performances.
In a certain way I’ve been trying to say (since my first essay in these pages) that each fragment of time contains all of time. The poem spreads that fragment of time before us.
Here’s a better how-to: an astonishment, in fact, though it seems on the surface to be about music, think of it instead of the writer’s Rosetta Stone. Benjamin Zander talks about music, and demonstrates how music leaves the page and enters the soul. Forgive the abstractions, here they’re made patent. It’s an utterly brilliant, and unutterably funny, piece. Ultimately, it’s life altering for the poet who will make the necessary transposition:
One cannot watch this shortish video and not become a better writer.
We’re hostage to our inner geography, its Greek roots twining into “earth” and “write.” Somewhere inside we’re a map of ourselves, and the temptation is to flatten out the creases on our writing tables. Leave it alone. Just feel it with your fingers. See how our inner province is a chunk of Stonehenge, slightly broader at the base than the top, though not much, cross-pieced with our interior territories, a bearing beam that supports our antipodes. Take a look at that inner monk, as lame and ancient as eternal, moving more slowly than slow. See how she refuses your help. How he refuses mine. The inner courtyard fills up with snow, and that very monk hands you a letter and departs, footsteps filling up with snow, like blessings.
Time to write down what it says.
Tom D'Evelyn
January 12, 2012
This is superbly done! It’s taken me decades to figure out what you say here so eloquently. I’d be tempted to mark some distinctions between Heidegger and Gilson, but I see what you mean. Your sense of consciousness as “metaxic” (not your word!) is the key. I do careful analysis of poems at http://tomdevelyn.info/
Thanks for this glorious post. I will be promoting it!
Jeffrey Levine
January 12, 2012
Thanks so much for this! As to Heidegger/Gilson, I wanted to properly attribute the thought, but I’m not at all sure that Gilson wholly “got” Heidegger on the redemption of his “negative” concept of finitude through transcendence. But Heidegger’s phenomenology and Gilson’s notion of the status of the infinity of the other are divergent as can be. But these sorts of distinctions are best reserved for an entirely different sort of blog.
Tom D'Evelyn
January 12, 2012
As for Heidegger and Gilson, one is very close to the “ethos” we share today without any special effort; a cultural fix at least in intellectual circles. Gilson’s work on the “ontological difference” I have found illuminating but you’re right, that’s a different blog. I’ve been known to bring it up pretty consistently in, say, haiku forums, where Basho’s ethos, drawn from Chuang Tzu as well as medieval Japanese poets, is an equivalent cultural form. I’m now reading all sorts of poets with this ethos in mind. A canonical poem like Mary Oliver’s “Wild Geese” really opens up when seen with the idea of a mysterious surplus of being as a gift if we can only open consciousness to it. Again, thanks for the stimulating discussion! We’ll be discussing it at our meeting of The Poetry Collective at Sheafe St Books, Portsmouth, tonight!
Jeffrey Levine
January 12, 2012
Thanks again, Tom. It’s a discussion we need to have. And Wild Geese is one of those rare poems that somehow seems to fully attach the unconscious to the rim of the world, if only for a moment or two. Anyway, about doings at Sheafe St Books, as Plato said to me in elementary school, “cool!”
carlen1717
January 12, 2012
Jeffrey, what a fresh start this is. I am always happy to consider questions of the soul, and I like that you hold that discussion alongside another about time and art. Those three seem to me to form their own kind of pagan trinity, divine by its own authority.
I’ll keep my eyes open for the TED lecture link fix. Thanks.
Jeffrey Levine
January 12, 2012
Carlen, “Pagan trinity, divine by its own authority” is a transcendent phrase! I love it. By my own authority.
Pilar Graham
January 12, 2012
More insightful, brilliant, and inspiring writing by Levine!
Really love the that “each fragment of time contains all time. The poem spreads that fragment of time before us.” Lovely. This encompasses what ultimately shapes art.
I believe poetry is a conversation of the senses, and the inner geography, maps, and more, all participate in this carnival and transfiguration of the poem.
elenakarina55
January 13, 2012
Wonderful!!!
Sylva Portoian
January 14, 2012
Very deep …
deeper than any divine
deeper than red blood color
deeper than hidden volcanos
deeper than ocean’s depth
deeper than any secret of any heart
deeper than unheard sense
It is a new style
Yet, unborn
Yet, to be known…!
Sylva Portoian
January 14, 2012
If Khatchaturian symphonies forgotten
The Armenian Nation will vanish
Jeffrey Levine
January 14, 2012
An enormous and devastatingly ignored brilliance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaGpaJBDzH4
Vin Jensen
January 14, 2012
Thanks, Jeffrey. What you have to say about watching the Zander video applies also to reading your blog.
Jeffrey Levine
January 14, 2012
Well, THAT brought tears to my eyes! Thanks so much, Vin.
Juliet Rodeman
January 22, 2012
Thanks for Zander and his audience, Jeffrey. How Zander brought us there, to that room. And thanks to you. Your blog. You brought them here.